The argument of this as an enforced law is difficult. How can strangers (the jury) define when information is personal when they all have had different experiences in life?
In my opinion, the invasion of privacy from a government, is one that is bad, but also unavoidable if we want a 'safer world'. This is not a view of broad assumptions, but maybe we could monitor crimes better with surveillance. If we have nothing (illegal) to hide, we have nothing to be ashamed of.

Thanks for listening (Sort Of!)
No comments:
Post a Comment